| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@sfgoth.com) |
| From: | chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:55:07 -0400 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> of "Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:07:50 BST." <20030922180749.A26432@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <20030922180749.A26432@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Christoph Hellwig writes: >Umm, shouldn't you just ifdef out the whole function and it's >assignment to the operations vector? This looks horribly ugly.. i suppose i am not convinced that two #ifdef/#endif's are better than an #if/#else/#endif |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@sfgoth.com), Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@sfgoth.com), Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@sfgoth.com), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [lanai] ioctl only meant for debugging (from mitch@sfgoth.com), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |