| To: | Tom Marshall <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64 |
| From: | Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:57:50 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030916151533.GA28380@home.tig-grr.com> |
| References: | <200309022116.41697.bdschuym@pandora.be> <20030916140621.GE810@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> <20030916151533.GA28380@home.tig-grr.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5 |
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 17:15, Tom Marshall wrote: > > But ipt_physdev is a 2.6ism, thus we can still introduce any > > incompatibility... For me it's enough to be compatible within 2.4 or > > within 2.6.x (once 2.6.0 is out). > > Noooo! Please don't break compatibility for 2.6. I really don't want to > have separate /sbin/iptables-2.4 and /sbin/iptables-2.6 binaries. 2.4 hasn't got ipt_physdev |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH][ATM][2.4] split atm_ioctl into vcc_ioctl and atm_dev_ioctl, chas williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 1243] New: Communication with ipsec api seems to hang after some operation, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, Tom Marshall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |