| To: | "Jay Vosburgh" <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5 |
| From: | Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:31:48 +0300 |
| Cc: | <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A02A464A9@hasmsx403.iil.intel.com> |
| Organization: | Intel corp. |
| References: | <E791C176A6139242A988ABA8B3D9B38A02A464A9@hasmsx403.iil.intel.com> |
| Reply-to: | shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.4.3 |
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 04:11 am, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > >On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:57:26 -0700 > > > >Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> My only concern is a matter of timing; we're right at the > >> end of synchronizing the 2.4 and 2.6 bonding sources. Once > >> that's settled (hopefully in a few days, the last patch set for > >> 2.4 came in this morning), then removing them from that header > >> and the bonding code should be fine. > > > >No problem. Just push the change to Jeff then after you're > >done merging stuff around, ok? > > Will do. I'm on the verge of finishing my cleanup set re-do. Now that Amir sent all the synching stuff, I could put that one in as well, and it would fit on both 2.4 and 2.6. -- | Shmulik Hen Advanced Network Services | | Israel Design Center, Jerusalem | | LAN Access Division, Platform Networking | | Intel Communications Group, Intel corp. | |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH][2.4][ATM] implement br2684_ioctl_hook for br2684, chas williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, Harald Welte |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5, Jay Vosburgh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5, Jay Vosburgh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |