| To: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx>, acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64 |
| From: | Tom Marshall <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:15:33 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030916140621.GE810@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> |
| References: | <200309022116.41697.bdschuym@pandora.be> <20030905153152.GA3623@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> <20030908191400.5ef59ab6.davem@redhat.com> <200309132159.37834.bdschuym@pandora.be> <20030915155903.12a3f95d.davem@redhat.com> <20030916140621.GE810@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:59:03PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > > I have to reject the fix for this problem again. > > > > You can't change the struct exported to userspace in any way > > without breaking the tools. I tried to explain this in the > > first revision of your change. > > But ipt_physdev is a 2.6ism, thus we can still introduce any > incompatibility... For me it's enough to be compatible within 2.4 or > within 2.6.x (once 2.6.0 is out). Noooo! Please don't break compatibility for 2.6. I really don't want to have separate /sbin/iptables-2.4 and /sbin/iptables-2.6 binaries. -- Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, Harald Welte |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH][ATM][2.4] split atm_ioctl into vcc_ioctl and atm_dev_ioctl, chas williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, Harald Welte |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, Bart De Schuymer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |