| To: | Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:53:33 -0700 |
| Cc: | rddunlap@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200309152357.h8FNvQ73013361@death.ibm.com> |
| References: | <20030915155415.73c5056d.davem@redhat.com> <200309152357.h8FNvQ73013361@death.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:57:26 -0700 Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My only concern is a matter of timing; we're right at the end > of synchronizing the 2.4 and 2.6 bonding sources. Once that's settled > (hopefully in a few days, the last patch set for 2.4 came in this > morning), then removing them from that header and the bonding code > should be fine. No problem. Just push the change to Jeff then after you're done merging stuff around, ok? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5, Jay Vosburgh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] get rid of dev_get in wanrouter, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5, Jay Vosburgh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: [Kernel-janitors] old ioctl definitions in 2.5, Jay Vosburgh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |