netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Bluetooth BUG() in set_sk_owner().

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bluetooth BUG() in set_sk_owner().
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:22:23 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, makx@xxxxxxxxxxxx, marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1063184337.32473.529.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <1063184337.32473.529.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:58:57 +0100
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It loks like the recent addition of sk_set_owner() to 
> bt_sock_alloc() was bogus... some of the callers of bt_sock_alloc()
> already do that for  This patch reverts it, and makes the remaining
> callers also set the owner for themselves...

Applied, thanks David.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: !CONFIG_PROC_FS fix for ipv6, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, jamal
Previous by Thread:  Bluetooth BUG() in set_sk_owner()., David Woodhouse
Next by Thread:  Re: Bluetooth BUG() in set_sk_owner()., David Woodhouse
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]