| To: | vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5+1) Autoconfig link-local addr to IPv6 tunnels |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 03 Sep 2003 19:22:26 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309031232010.5039-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20030903.063705.89449634.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309031232010.5039-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309031232010.5039-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 3
Sep 2003 13:17:56 +0300 (EEST)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> Come to think of it a more elegant solution might be:
>
> if (ifp->idev->cnf.forwarding == 0 &&
> (dev->flags&IFF_LOOPBACK) == 0 &&
> + ifp->idev->cnf.rtr_solicits > 0 &&
> (ipv6_addr_type(&ifp->addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)) {
> struct in6_addr all_routers;
>
> and set both idev->cnf.rtr_solicits = 0 and idev->cnf.accept_ra = 0 for
> ARPHRD_TUNNEL6 devices
Yes, something like that.
> > Comment: this strategy is the "default."
> > We can (or even should) do this stretegy whenever we failed to
> > ipv6_generate_eui64() in addrconf_dev_config().
>
> Should I send a separate patch to enable the random interface ids in
> addrconf_dev_config()?
No, just move them to addrconf_dev_config().
--yoshfuji
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5+1) Autoconfig link-local addr to IPv6 tunnels, Ville Nuorvala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6.0-test4, 2.5.47, child qdiscs, parent not filled out?, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5+1) Autoconfig link-local addr to IPv6 tunnels, Ville Nuorvala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5+1) Autoconfig link-local addr to IPv6 tunnels, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |