| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: The recent free_netdev() conversion... |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Sep 2003 08:58:14 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3F536CB7.6060404@pobox.com> |
| References: | <3F535EBD.6090401@pobox.com> <20030901075345.4c35e3e6.davem@redhat.com> <3F536CB7.6060404@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:58:47 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > True, but for long term, it's best to use free_netdev(). Besides > naturally pairing with alloc_foodev(), if we ever decide to have > alloc_netdev() perform more than one allocation, free_netdev() will > already be in place to handle the multiple de-allocations. Okie dokie, I'll take patches that fix any of these cases. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: The recent free_netdev() conversion..., David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [bk patches] 2.4.x net driver updates, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: The recent free_netdev() conversion..., Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4-bk5 - Was: Re: The recent free_netdev() conversion..., David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |