| To: | Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5) Allow IPv6 tunnels without own IPv6 address |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:03:40 -0700 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309010931420.27694-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| References: | <20030901.112409.61391981.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309010931420.27694-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:18:30 +0300 (EEST) Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Unfortunately the IPv6 tunneling spec (RFC2473) is broken on this point :( > I should probably raise this issue on the IETF ipv6 WG mailing list. ... > The first problem is, that the way to generate the interface-identifier > isn't currently specified in the tunnel spec. ... > The second problem is, that this method alone doesn't yet guarantee > unique identifiers to the two tunnel endpoints. This is exactly what I was thinking. I really don't think link- local addresses make any sense on a software device such as the ipip6 tunnels. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5) Allow IPv6 tunnels without own IPv6 address, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1 is gone, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5) Allow IPv6 tunnels without own IPv6 address, Ville Nuorvala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: (5/5) Allow IPv6 tunnels without own IPv6 address, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |