| To: | Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow nested IPv6 encapsulations on same node |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:10:55 -0700 |
| Cc: | usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308271731140.7839-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| References: | <20030827064514.7c060a64.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308271731140.7839-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:42:21 +0300 (EEST) Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In the old days ip6_build_xmit() was the way to go if you wanted > fragmentation, but now ip6_fragment() _seems_ to be able to handle the > whole thing without the help of ip6_append_data() & Co. > > I'll have to test this and get back to you! Another point is that you really don't want to use sockets here for another reason, you're going to get artificial queueing limits bacause each tunnel packet gets charged to the socket. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Use ip6_dst_lookup() in ip6_tunnel.c, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [bonding][2/3] Synchronizing 2.4-2.6, Hen, Shmulik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow nested IPv6 encapsulations on same node, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] ethtool_ops bug, Matthew Wilcox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |