| To: | Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow nested IPv6 encapsulations on same node |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Aug 2003 06:45:14 -0700 |
| Cc: | usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308271441390.7839-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| References: | <20030827042036.3a00aca8.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308271441390.7839-100000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:22:38 +0300 (EEST) Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > > Why do you need to use sockets? Just send the packets out normally. > > Well ok, I don't need to use sockets, but I do need to use socks :) You don't need socks either. Using sockets is just a waste of memory, and you're only using them because of an interface problem. Do you see what I'm trying to say? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow nested IPv6 encapsulations on same node, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tcp socket missing from /proc/net/tcp, James H. Cloos Jr. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow nested IPv6 encapsulations on same node, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow nested IPv6 encapsulations on same node, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |