| To: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file |
| From: | "Chad N. Tindel" <chad@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Aug 2003 20:27:42 -0400 |
| Cc: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0308221016320.993-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au> |
| Mail-followup-to: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20030821165258.45f1ec53.shemminger@osdl.org> <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0308221016320.993-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
> > The name "/proc/net/bond0/info" is kind of unconventional, but now > > changing that in a almost stable release would be bad. Better choice > > would be "/proc/net/bonding/bond0". > > I'm not sure it's too late to do this. It certainly would match what other drivers do. Chad |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | IPSecv6/Neighbor discovery crash, latten |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] convering bonding driver /proc interface to seq_file, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] change /proc/bond0/info to /proc/bonding/bond0, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |