| To: | "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Best way to hook incoming eth pkts? |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:51:41 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1061401697.12293.8.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> |
| References: | <20030820154727.GB9119@gtf.org> <1061401697.12293.8.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:48:17AM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 08:47, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > ATA-over-ethernet has its own
> > IANA-registered ethernet type, but netconsole and netdump are using
> > IP/UDP instead of a custom ethernet protocol.
>
> This is useful, because it minimises the work needed to get them going
> over other transports, such as Myrinet. I'd rather not see the UDP
> encapsulation go away. Netconsole is already messy enough to configure
> and deal with; Matt Mackall's 2.6 forward port, that makes configuration
> more IP-oriented instead of less, is a step in the right direction.
Configuration has zero to do with the protocol of choice.
I fully agree that current RH netconsole/netdump configuration is
positively awful...
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Protect proxied addresses against DAD, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 2.4] kernel oops on VLAN removal, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Best way to hook incoming eth pkts?, Bryan O'Sullivan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Best way to hook incoming eth pkts?, Michael Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |