netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: (usagi-core 15040) [PATCH] IPv6: Protect proxied addresses against D

To: vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: (usagi-core 15040) [PATCH] IPv6: Protect proxied addresses against DAD
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:43:04 +0900 (JST)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308201423500.541-200000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308201423500.541-200000@rhea.tcs.hut.fi>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308201423500.541-200000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Wed, 20 
Aug 2003 14:40:14 +0300 (EEST)), Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> --- linux-2.5.OLD/net/ipv6/ndisc.c    2003-08-20 14:10:16.000000000 +0300
> +++ linux-2.5/net/ipv6/ndisc.c        2003-08-20 14:10:30.000000000 +0300
> @@ -861,7 +861,8 @@
>               struct inet6_dev *in6_dev = in6_dev_get(dev);
>  
>               if (in6_dev && in6_dev->cnf.forwarding &&
> -                 (addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST) &&
> +                 (addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST ||
> +                  addr_type == IPV6_ADDR_ANY) &&
>                   pneigh_lookup(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, dev, 0)) {
>                       int inc = ipv6_addr_type(daddr)&IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST;
>  

I believe we don't need this chunk.

--ypshfuj 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>