netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] (0/9) free_netdev -- delay freeing of net_device structure t

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (0/9) free_netdev -- delay freeing of net_device structure till after last use
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:30:22 -0700
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, mochel@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F42877B.9040407@pobox.com>
Organization: Open Source Development Lab
References: <20030819121800.009db89b.shemminger@osdl.org> <20030819124818.476dc36d.davem@redhat.com> <3F42877B.9040407@pobox.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:24:27 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> David,
> 
> Considering that these patches introduce only a tiny diff in the 
> low-level net driver, and that the viro work is still pending, I'm ok 
> with going ahead and applying these patches.
> 
> Since they mix net/* and drivers/net/*, I would actually prefer that you 
> merge 100% of the patchset, once the patchset is ok with you.

There was a tradeoff between what granularity of patchset. There is no
real dependency after the first two.


> Also, my tendency is to apply patches 1-8, and not apply patch 9 just 
> yet.  Even though patch 9 is a fix, those specific areas of code, I'm 
> betting, will change when those drivers are fixed WRT full dynamic 
> allocation and refcounting.
> 
> Comments?
> 
>       Jeff
>
Yeah, that is why 9 is last, so it can be split or dropped or whatever.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>