| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPsec: add support for Twofish and Serpent |
| From: | Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:34:01 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308142324310.29579-100000@netcore.fi> |
| References: | <20030814180857.GA4205@netppl.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308142324310.29579-100000@netcore.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:25:11PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > Very much agree. > > Also, I could be missing something, but I think it takes much more to add > an encryption algorithm than what the patch does?!?! > The algorithms were already part of the CryptoAPI. All the patch did was simply make them accessible to IPsec, by adding numerical IDs for ESP. Regards, -- Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx> 1024D/191FCD8A - 331A 9468 C04D 3A76 5C56 BA68 7EB7 92DF 191F CD8A 2048R/F515317D - 68 A9 0D 28 1B DF 8D 42 0F CC AF 98 A8 D5 A4 04 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netfilter6: REJECT target?, Peter Bieringer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPsec: add support for Twofish and Serpent, Kyle McMartin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPsec: add support for Twofish and Serpent, Kyle McMartin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPsec: add support for Twofish and Serpent, Kyle McMartin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |