netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: SZALAY Attila <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:03:40 -0700
Cc: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sasa@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030812140516.GA27237@mochrul.balabit>
References: <20030812132050.GA27178@mochrul.balabit> <20030812.225527.35784879.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20030812140516.GA27237@mochrul.balabit>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:05:16 +0200
SZALAY Attila <sasa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The patch in vanilla kernel:

As I said in another email, your patch is unnecessary and
the bug has been fixed in current kernels already.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Date:  Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: Problem with __check_and_rekey, SZALAY Attila
Next by Thread:  Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [SET 2][PATCH 2/8][bonding] Propagating master'ssettings toslaves, Shmulik Hen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]