Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement.

netdev

Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement.

To:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement.
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:26:33 -0700
Cc:	davej@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030812.021414.128414948.yoshfuji@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
References:	<E19mFqr-00068T-00@tetrachloride> <20030812.021414.128414948.yoshfuji@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 02:14:14 +0900 (JST)
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <E19mFqr-00068T-00@tetrachloride> (at Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:48:57 
> +0100), davej@xxxxxxxxxx says:
> 
> > Is this intentional? It should at least have a 
> > /* FALLTHROUGH */ or similar if so.
> 
> Of course not.

Patch applied, thanks David.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Missing break in switch statement., davej Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement., David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	RE: new SiS gige driver, Feldman, Scott
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] ipv4 reuses freed mem, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] Missing break in switch statement., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
Next by Thread:	[RFT][PATCH] cleanup net/atm/br2684.c, Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]