| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFT][PATCH] cleanup net/atm/br2684.c |
| From: | Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:58:57 -0700 |
| Cc: | chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030811114823.5b81474c.shemminger@osdl.org> |
| References: | <20030811114823.5b81474c.shemminger@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
You might also want to send this patch to the linux-atm mailing list: linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unfortunately you need to subscribe to post. http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-atm-general Not sure how many ATM users are following 2.6 yet though. I might be able to give it a spin soon. > - unregister_netdev(&brdev->net_dev); > - kfree(brdev); > + unregister_netdev(brdev->net_dev); > + kfree(brdev->net_dev); Mmmm.. I see this snippet in your diff in multiplce places and it looks wrong. Where does the "brdev" structure get freed now? -Mitch |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] High Performance Packet Classifiction for tc framework, Michael Bellion and Thomas Heinz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFT][PATCH] cleanup net/atm/br2684.c, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFT][PATCH] cleanup net/atm/br2684.c, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFT][PATCH] cleanup net/atm/br2684.c, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |