| To: | Alan Shih <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TOE brain dump |
| From: | Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:15:25 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, Werner Almesberger <werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <ODEIIOAOPGGCDIKEOPILEEOCDAAA.alan@storlinksemi.com>; from alan@storlinksemi.com on Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:19:21AM -0700 |
| References: | <20030804163606.Q639@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> <ODEIIOAOPGGCDIKEOPILEEOCDAAA.alan@storlinksemi.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2i |
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:19:21AM -0700, Alan Shih wrote: > So would main processor still need a copy of the data for re-transmission? > Won't that defeat the purpose? No, since I didn't state that a retransmission is done along the pipe, because you cannot go back in a pipeline. A retransmission can be done at the end of the pipe, where this can also be done in hardware. Regards Ingo Oeser |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: VLAN patch for 2.4.21, Hen, Shmulik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: TOE brain dump, David Schwartz |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: TOE brain dump, Alan Shih |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TOE brain dump, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |