| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:51:37 -0700 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030804203524.GA15874@colin2.muc.de> |
| References: | <20030804125022.GA8167@averell> <20030804.215801.124854897.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20030804130408.GA36367@colin2.muc.de> <20030804114507.6e496c77.davem@redhat.com> <20030804203524.GA15874@colin2.muc.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 4 Aug 2003 22:35:24 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok, here is a new patch again current BKCVS. It also moves the > inet_peer_idlock > only inside netsyms. This one is missing net/xfrm/xfrm_export.c :-( Andi, please be more careful with your patches. I'd suggest use subversions or whatever source management system you like best to help avoid these problems in the future. You seem to be chronicly making mistakes like this, as if you're rushing things. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Make XFRM optional, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |