netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool_ops rev 4
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:43:28 -0700
Cc: willy@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F2AFAF4.3040604@pobox.com>
References: <20030801150232.GV22222@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030801154021.GA7696@gtf.org> <20030801154656.GW22222@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030801162536.GA18574@gtf.org> <20030801132037.3f3542ae.davem@redhat.com> <3F2AE91D.5090705@pobox.com> <20030801153255.204baf66.davem@redhat.com> <3F2AF141.2010308@pobox.com> <20030801160136.3342c5cc.davem@redhat.com> <3F2AF525.3000605@pobox.com> <20030801161937.1d9a7126.davem@redhat.com> <3F2AFAF4.3040604@pobox.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:42:44 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Still need the boring and obvious definition of SET_ETHTOOL_OPS in 
> mainline, though.

Like I said, I've got no problem with that part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>