| To: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netdev_ops retraction |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:41:08 -0700 |
| Cc: | willy@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030730233541.GB7057@conectiva.com.br> |
| References: | <20030730184416.GI22222@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030730233541.GB7057@conectiva.com.br> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:35:42 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Em Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 07:44:16PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox escreveu:
> > I think there's still scope for a netdev_ops patch, but it's of dubious
> > value
> > and more of a 2.7 project.
>
> OK with me, I mentioned this in a brainstorm and thought of it as a 2.7 thing
> anyway.
I'm ok with the simplified ethtool-only version too.
Although I'm confused about what kind of problem there is with
netdev_ops being such a "large structure".
This is the kind of thing there'd be _ONE_ copy of in each driver,
ala.
struct netdev_ops tg3_netdev_ops {
...
.foo = tg3_foo,
...
};
...
tp->dev->netdev_ops = &tg3_netdev_ops;
...
Right?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netdev_ops retraction, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] 2.4.22-pre9-bk : bonding bug fixes, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netdev_ops retraction, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netdev_ops retraction, Matthew Wilcox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |