| To: | Glenn Fowler <gsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair() |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:07 -0700 |
| Cc: | gsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dgk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307231814.OAA74344@raptor.research.att.com> |
| References: | <200307231428.KAA15254@raptor.research.att.com> <20030723074615.25eea776.davem@redhat.com> <200307231656.MAA69129@raptor.research.att.com> <20030723100043.18d5b025.davem@redhat.com> <200307231724.NAA90957@raptor.research.att.com> <20030723103135.3eac4cd2.davem@redhat.com> <200307231814.OAA74344@raptor.research.att.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:14:57 -0400 (EDT) Glenn Fowler <gsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > named sockets seem a little heavyweight for this application I think it'll be cheaper than unnamed unix sockets and groveling in /proc/*/fd/ And even if there is a minor performance issue, you'll more than get that back due to the portability gain. :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), Glenn Fowler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Limit skb to be less than 64K with TSO, Feldman, Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), Glenn Fowler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kernel bug in socketpair(), Glenn Fowler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |