| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5 |
| From: | chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:03:30 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 05:24:16 PDT." <20030721052416.3ef97f3b.davem@redhat.com> |
| Reply-to: | chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <20030721052416.3ef97f3b.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>,"David S. Miller" writes: >> (and how does __inline__ work >> when its the timer function?) > >If you take the address of a function marked inline, >gcc outputs a non-inline of the function. i figured that. tagging this function inline is essentially pointless. (which was sort of my point in a roundabout way) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][2.4] more atm backports for 2.4, chas williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][2.4] more atm backports for 2.4, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][ATM] minor cleanups for 2.5, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anycast usage, final diagnosis? (was: IPv6: Fix broken anycast usage), kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |