| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jul 2003 04:03:56 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307160901560.20100-100000@netcore.fi> from "Pekka Savola" at Jul 16, 2003 09:03:57 AM |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > > > What happens when you do "ping6 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::1" ? > > > > Hey, you have lost track, rewind several mails ago. > > Nope. I'm just pointing out the general concept. > > > Of course, ping and > > any other protocols will work, how can it not work? :-) > > It has been made shown to work on other platforms, so why not Linux? ping did, does and will work and I do not understand what you want to say or ask. Do you want to know how it works? Well, IPv6 stack looks up the address in routing tables, finds the route, sees that it is on-link, sends NDISC, receiver replies, we create a frame and send the echo request. To continue? :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow 6to4 routes with SIT, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |