| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ifenslave.c |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:14:26 -0700 |
| Cc: | mmj@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030716141206.GB5628@gtf.org> |
| References: | <20030716092354.GC24077@suse.de> <20030716054255.1922d299.davem@redhat.com> <20030716141206.GB5628@gtf.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:12:06 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There ARE definitions that differ between kernel and userspace. Sure, but none of the one's were talking about here. > Thinking they are the same is not founded in reality. I'm not. > And thinking that all of userspace is instantly recompiled against > against the latest kernel headers isn't founded in reality, either. GLIBC is munging netlink messages on the way out via sendmsg()? That'd be news to me. :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ifenslave.c, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | e1000 with 82546EB parts on 2.4?, Matthew Dharm |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ifenslave.c, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | e1000 with 82546EB parts on 2.4?, Matthew Dharm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |