| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jul 2003 03:19:00 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307152025570.14070-100000@netcore.fi> from "Pekka Savola" at éÀÌ 15, 2003 08:29:11 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Assume you're a host on a link with prefix 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::/64. The router > is the one with interface ID one. Not going to work. Host autoconfiguration conventions have nothing to do with real addressing. Proceeding in this way you will denounce neighbour discovery, what the hell to do this when hw address can be recovered from EUI64 token? :-) > What happens when you do "ping6 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::1" ? Hey, you have lost track, rewind several mails ago. Of course, ping and any other protocols will work, how can it not work? :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [1/2] kernel error reporting (revised), kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow 6to4 routes with SIT, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |