| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73 |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 15:59:30 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307150117.FAA06705@dub.inr.ac.ru> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307141300520.5140-100000@DYN318430.beaverton.ibm.com> <200307150117.FAA06705@dub.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <200307150117.FAA06705@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:17:53 +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says: > Hello! > > > inet6_fill_ifaddr (and introduce RTM_IFACEFLAGS). This will be specific to > > IPv6. Are you agreeable to this ? > ... > > + IFA_IFFLAGS, > > What's about ifa_flags? There is some space there, and the things > kept there now: TENTATIVE/DEPRECATED et al. are close relatives > of O/M. Alexey, O/M are not flags for addresses, but for interfaces. I believe we should not mix them up. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow 6to4 routes with SIT, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH][ATM] some misc sk-related fixups for atm, chas williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |