| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:49:43 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030710.214551.08349572.davem@redhat.com> from "David S. Miller" at éÀÌ 10, 2003 09:45:51 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Alexey, please add some sanity to this discussion. It is about anycast addresses, I maybe not competent here. I have no idea what is purpose of all-routers anycast. However, my modest opinion is here: IN NO WAY ANYCAST ADDRESSES MAY BE USED AS NEXTHOP ADDRESSES. NEXTHOP ADDRESS IS THE ADDRESS WHICH IS EXPECTED TO BE SOURCE OF REDIRECT MESSAGES ET AL. ANYCAST ADDRESSES ARE INVALID AS SOURCE, HENCE... Period. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel locking up in module, N N Ashok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPVS' Kconfig LBLC and LBLCR configuration typo, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Mika Penttilä |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |