netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked

To: pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:04:49 +0900 (JST)
Cc: mika.liljeberg@xxxxxxxxx, andre@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111143470.26262-100000@netcore.fi>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20030711.143926.599349332.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111143470.26262-100000@netcore.fi>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111143470.26262-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 
Jul 2003 11:46:00 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> > I don't like this
> > while I would be ok to have configuration option
> > not to support anycast.
> 
> With "not to support anycast" you probably meant "not to support
> subnet-router anycast address [automatically, in the kernel, as now]" ?  
> These are entirely different things.

I meant disabling anycast entirely.

> (Note that if there's a user-level API for setting anycast addresses, one 
> could kick the subnet-router anycast address out of the kernel too.  
> Whether that's desirable is another thing.)

We have but we cannot; it is refcnt'ed.

--yoshfuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>