Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling broken

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307101906160.18224-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 10 
Jul 2003 19:08:20 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> While technically correct, I'm still not sure if this is (pragmatically) 
> the correct approach.  It's OK to set a default route to go to the 
> subnet routers anycast address (so, setting a route to prefix:: should 
> not give you EINVAL).

But, on the other side cannot use prefix::, and
the setting is rather non-sense.

We should educate people not to use /127; use /64 instead.
v6ops? :-)

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA