| To: | cat@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:55:42 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030710154302.GE1722@zip.com.au> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20030710154302.GE1722@zip.com.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20030710154302.GE1722@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:43:03 +1000), CaT <cat@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > With 2.4.21-pre2 I can get a nice tunnel going over my ppp connection > and as such get ipv6 connectivity. I think went to 2.4.21 and then to > 2.4.22-pre4 and bringing up the tunnel fails as follows: : > ip addr add 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::37/127 dev sit1 > ip route add ::/0 via 3ffe:8001:000c:ffff::36 > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument This is not bug, but rather misconfiguration; you cannot use prefix::, which is mandatory subnet routers anycast address, as unicast address. Thank you. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [[RFT] convert appletalk over to new protocol, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, CaT |
| Previous by Thread: | 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, CaT |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked, CaT |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |