netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, tgraf@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030711.093546.12708723.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <20030710233223.GA30577@rei.rakuen> <20030711.093546.12708723.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:35:46 +0900 (JST)
   
   I aggeed on this, however we may want to do for whole tree at same time.
   How do you think, folks?

Sure, just send more patches relative to this one :-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]