| To: | jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (James Morris) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: shutdown() and SHUT_RD on TCP sockets - broken? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Jul 2003 21:03:07 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | mtk-lists@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0307090227050.9091-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au> from "James Morris" at éÀÌ 09, 2003 02:28:12 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > blocks. I see that this also occurs on FreeBSD 4.8, Tru64 5.1B, > HP/UX 11 and Solaris 8. Have I misunderstood Stevens, Most likely, it is that rare case when Stevens forgot to check the statement. From viewpoint of TCP the behaviour described in Stevens' book is highly unnatural. SHUT_RD on TCP does not make any sense. > described here. But, why do things happen in this way on Linux? Actually, you could check one more thing. What does happen after freebsd 4.8 returns 0 on read()? Does it open window eventually? As you checked, all the stacks ignore SHUT_RD, when receiving data and queue it anyway. And when read()ing Linux and, apparently Solaris, prefer to return this data. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: shutdown() and SHUT_RD on TCP sockets - broken?, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling, Paul Albrecht |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: shutdown() and SHUT_RD on TCP sockets - broken?, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: shutdown() and SHUT_RD on TCP sockets - broken?, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |