netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type(

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type()
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 19:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0307062238010.468-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au>
References: <Mutt.LNX.4.44.0307062238010.468-100000@excalibur.intercode.com.au>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 22:42:40 +1000 (EST)

   This patch fixes a problem where request_module() was being called
   under the lock taken in xfrm_policy_get_afinfo().

Looks good, applied.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Question about netlink, kuznet
Next by Date:  Re: shutdown() and SHUT_RD on TCP sockets - broken?, mtk-lists
Previous by Thread:  [PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type(), James Morris
Next by Thread:  Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling, Nivedita Singhvi
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]