| To: | Jeff Sipek <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/5] 64-bit network statistics - generic net |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Jul 2003 23:51:31 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307051700.32533.jeffpc@optonline.net>; from jeffpc@optonline.net on Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:59:05PM -0400 |
| References: | <E19YtAq-0006Xf-00@calista.inka.de> <200307051637.52252.jeffpc@optonline.net> <3F0737D1.5090109@pobox.com> <200307051700.32533.jeffpc@optonline.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Jeff Sipek <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [network counter overflow on 32 bits systems] > The thing is that x86 is here to stay for quite some time. Even if 64-bit > processors take over the market, you will have so many "old" computers that > can: > > - - be thrown out > - - donated to some institution > - - converted to routers, and other "embedded" systems > > Plus, they will be dirt cheap. - the PCI bus don't/won't/can't handle multiple 10 Gb/s adapters; - nobody sane would recycle x86 systems as core routers after having bought a few Gb/s link. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | tc stack overflow, Thomas Heinz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/5] 64-bit network statistics - generic net, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/5] 64-bit network statistics - generic net, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/5] 64-bit network statistics - generic net, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |