| To: | Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP |
| From: | Frank Cusack <fcusack@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:51:19 -0700 |
| Cc: | James Carlson <carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, fcusack@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030627213846.V90398@shell.cyberus.ca>; from hadi@shell.cyberus.ca on Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:21:21PM -0400 |
| References: | <20030625.143334.85380461.davem@redhat.com> <20030626035824.D68B62C147@lists.samba.org> <20030625.205941.41631020.davem@redhat.com> <16122.53298.150512.793074@h006008986325.ne.client2.attbi.com> <20030626190407.S87648@shell.cyberus.ca> <16124.11495.374998.153330@h006008986325.ne.client2.attbi.com> <20030627213846.V90398@shell.cyberus.ca> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:21:21PM -0400, Jamal Hadi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, James Carlson wrote: > > > > Loss preserves ordering. To get misordering, you have to > > intentionally hold onto a message and reinsert it later. What I've > > And thats what i was implying. > In your above example: > > 1 2 4 5 6 > If the entity above the wire cared about packet 3 there will be a > retransmit. so it becomes: > > 1 2 4 5 6 3 Higher layer entities doing retransmits is not reordering. To the lower layer, it's just the next message. /fc |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, John Bradford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | tg3 lockup under load on SMP kernel, Stuart Anderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP, Jamal Hadi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP, Michal Ostrowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |