netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP

To: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP
From: Frank Cusack <fcusack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:51:19 -0700
Cc: James Carlson <carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, fcusack@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030627213846.V90398@shell.cyberus.ca>; from hadi@shell.cyberus.ca on Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:21:21PM -0400
References: <20030625.143334.85380461.davem@redhat.com> <20030626035824.D68B62C147@lists.samba.org> <20030625.205941.41631020.davem@redhat.com> <16122.53298.150512.793074@h006008986325.ne.client2.attbi.com> <20030626190407.S87648@shell.cyberus.ca> <16124.11495.374998.153330@h006008986325.ne.client2.attbi.com> <20030627213846.V90398@shell.cyberus.ca>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:21:21PM -0400, Jamal Hadi wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, James Carlson wrote:
> >
> > Loss preserves ordering.  To get misordering, you have to
> > intentionally hold onto a message and reinsert it later.  What I've
> 
> And thats what i was implying.
> In your above example:
> 
> 1 2 4 5 6
> If the entity above the wire cared about packet 3 there will be a
> retransmit. so it becomes:
> 
> 1 2 4 5 6 3

Higher layer entities doing retransmits is not reordering.  To the lower
layer, it's just the next message.

/fc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>