netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org

To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:14:32 -0700
Cc: bcollins@xxxxxxxxxx, davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <35240000.1056760723@[10.10.2.4]>
References: <20030626.224739.88478624.davem@redhat.com> <21740000.1056724453@[10.10.2.4]> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306270749020.4137@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com> <20030627.143738.41641928.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306271454490.4457@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com> <20030627213153.GR501@phunnypharm.org> <20030627162527.714091ce.akpm@digeo.com> <35240000.1056760723@[10.10.2.4]>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  I think your suggestion of sending new bugs out to LKML has made a big
>  dent in the one<->one problem already. Replacing all the default owner 
>  fields with mailing lists (either existing ones or new ones) instead of 
>  individuals would be another step in that direction, though there may
>  be a few hurdles to deal with on the way to that.
> 
>  Yes, we probably also need an "email back in" interface as we've 
>  discussed before to take it up to many-many.

Both these things would help heaps - the tracking system then
becomes invisible, basically.  The best of both.  Can we make it so?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>