| To: | davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:37:38 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306270749020.4137@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com> |
| References: | <20030626.224739.88478624.davem@redhat.com> <21740000.1056724453@[10.10.2.4]> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306270749020.4137@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT) The good of a bug tracking system against the mailing list is that bugs do survive in a bug tracking system, No, this is the _BAD_ part, shit accumulates equally with useful reports. Useful reports in non-bugtracking system environments get retransmitted and eventually looked at. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Davide Libenzi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |