netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP

To: James Carlson <carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:18:20 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, fcusack@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16122.53298.150512.793074@h006008986325.ne.client2.attbi.com>
References: <20030625.143334.85380461.davem@redhat.com> <20030626035824.D68B62C147@lists.samba.org> <20030625.205941.41631020.davem@redhat.com> <16122.53298.150512.793074@h006008986325.ne.client2.attbi.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, James Carlson wrote:

> David S. Miller writes:
> If so, then that needs to be taken up with the manufacturer.  That's a
> rather severe design flaw that will prevent such a card from ever
> being used for anything other than IP -- many other protocols *ASSUME*
> that packets on a single wire cannot be reordered, including SNA, PPP
> (!), and link aggregation, among others.
>

So what about packet being loss? Wouldnt that ensure reordering?
And there is no such thing as a lossless wire.

cheers,
jamal

PS:- Paulus i wasnt preaching getting rid of ppp/pppoe although its
a nice thouhgt. More fix linux pppd and pppoe ;->

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>