| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP |
| From: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:17:45 +1000 |
| Cc: | paulus@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, fcusack@xxxxxxxxx, carlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:59:41 MST." <20030625.205941.41631020.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <20030625.205941.41631020.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> you write: > From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:57:09 +1000 > > Frankly, I'm amazed anyone sees reordering in real life... > > Many paths on the internet are quite reordered, this is > the first thing. In fact, I claim that any TCP stack that > doesn't do reordering detection is busted performance wise. Sure, but I was assuming that the packets arrived in order and got processed out of order. If the first one isn't happening, this patch is doubly useless 8) Thanks, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6: make several ndisc private stuff static, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |