| To: | lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e100-3.0.0_dev8 "Minneapolis Moline" release |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:26:03 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <slrnbf11i5.kck.lunz@stoli.localnet> |
| References: | <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E010107D977@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com> <slrnbf11i5.kck.lunz@stoli.localnet> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Is the anonymous union in struct cb some kind of gcc3-only thing? It doesn't compile for my debian woody gcc 2.95 unless I name the union member. Yes, please don't use anonymous unions in kernel code that you expect to compile anything other than the most recent versions of gcc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Convert pppoe to new style protocol, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: (usagi-users 02435) Re: IPv6 bugs introduced in 2.4.21, Andre Tomt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e100-3.0.0_dev8 "Minneapolis Moline" release, Jason Lunz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e100-3.0.0_dev8 "Minneapolis Moline" release, Jason Lunz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |