netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: e100-3.0.0_dev8 "Minneapolis Moline" release

To: lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: e100-3.0.0_dev8 "Minneapolis Moline" release
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <slrnbf11i5.kck.lunz@stoli.localnet>
References: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E010107D977@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com> <slrnbf11i5.kck.lunz@stoli.localnet>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:33:25 +0000 (UTC)

   Is the anonymous union in struct cb some kind of gcc3-only thing? It
   doesn't compile for my debian woody gcc 2.95 unless I name the union
   member.
   
Yes, please don't use anonymous unions in kernel code that
you expect to compile anything other than the most recent
versions of gcc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>