In article <3EEF7E09.8080608@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:46:01 -0700),
Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> I have a question about the following, which seems to be the
> approach both of you prefer. I thought we need a new routing
> message type called RTM_GETPLIST which will return full prefix
> list. If you use RTA_RA6INFO, then should that trigger only
> when the prefix list has changed (add or delete) ? Should I
> have both interfaces, one for returning entire list (RTM) and
> one for changes in prefix list (RTA) ?
>
> Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
Well, I think the problem is to set RTF_ADDRCONF flag to all prefix routes.
I beleive this should be for autoconf (RA) routes only as comments says;
dad_starts and multicast add routes with such flag, but this should be wrong.
After we fix this, we can get prefix information filtering routes by
RTF_ADDRCONF flag; of course, we can get the routes using RTM_GETROUTE.
--
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
|