| To: | sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance tests |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:59:21 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030616234937.GE18484@netnation.com> |
| References: | <20030616.160856.35828947.davem@redhat.com> <20030616232750.GD18484@netnation.com> <20030616234937.GE18484@netnation.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:49:37 -0700 60.0073 seconds passed, avg forwarding rate: 157557.710 pps ...Looks like a tad worse than with your patch, but not by much. Forwarding rate is still pretty crappy for an Opteron. Will fiddle a bit more tonight to see what I can do. To be honest, this isn't half-bad for pure DoS load. This reminds me, maybe a good test would be PPS for "well behaved flows" in the presence of DoS load. You'd probably need 4 systems to carry out such a test accurately. Because, really, who cares how fast we can forward the DoS traffic as long as legitimate users still see good metrics. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPSEC problems with GRE., kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch for common networking error messages, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance tests, Simon Kirby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance tests, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |