netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: gettime: Was (Re: Route cache performance under stress

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gettime: Was (Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ak@xxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3EE81E89.1040004@candelatech.com>
References: <20030611120803.GB22720@wotan.suse.de> <20030611.203015.104061804.davem@redhat.com> <3EE81E89.1040004@candelatech.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:32:41 -0700

   skb->rx_stamp = getCurTSC();

Thanks for mentioned this idea for the 10th time in
the past 2 days :-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, Henrik Petander
Next by Date:  Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: gettime: Was (Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ben Greear
Next by Thread:  Re: gettime: Was (Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ben Greear
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]