netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.5.70+] tun using alloc_netdev

To: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.70+] tun using alloc_netdev
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030611194317.GE31051@gtf.org>
References: <20030609115857.38bb31d6.shemminger@osdl.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20030611121155.0b659e20@unixmail.qualcomm.com> <20030611194317.GE31051@gtf.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:43:18 -0400

   On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:21:44PM -0700, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
   > This is wrong. register_netdevice() does not expand name (ie %d stuff).
   > So dev_alloc_name() is still needed. i.e.
   
   Correct.
   
   But, register_netdev() is preferred precisely for this reason.
   
Right.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>