| To: | lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6 |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:20:03 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lpetande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ajtuomin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jagana@xxxxxxxxxx, kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3EE6ECD3.6050103@tml.hut.fi> |
| References: | <3EE5F85E.9080006@tml.hut.fi> <20030610.095135.28806569.davem@redhat.com> <3EE6ECD3.6050103@tml.hut.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:48:19 +0300 Does this make sense to you? No it doesn't. When you startup zebra, it may flush the entire routing table. You must make zebra aware of any static or dynamic routes you care about. It manages entire routing table and that is the end of the story. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.70] acenic -- update to use alloc_etherdev, Jes Sorensen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gettime: Was (Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, Henrik Petander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, Henrik Petander |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |