| To: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance tests |
| From: | Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:23:28 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, CIT/Paul <xerox@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'David S. Miller'" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, "fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030610075732.GD23009@netnation.com> |
| References: | <20030610075732.GD23009@netnation.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Simon Kirby wrote: [some good stuff deleted] Simon, I havent looked at your data in details; i will. Someone like Robert would be able to snuff it much faster than i do. I just wanna say thanks for the effort, I will spend time catching up with you folks. It is clear that our next hurudle is gc. Do you have profiles for your data? Profiles would be nice to collect as well. > In any case, setting gc_min_interval to 0 definitely helped, but I > suspect Dave's patches will make a bigger difference. Next up is > 2.5.70-bk14 and 2.5.70-bk14+davem's stuff from yesterday. > Also since you are doing all that work post the kernels somewhere so people like foo can grab them and test as well. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Jamal Hadi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Jamal Hadi |
| Previous by Thread: | Route cache performance tests, Simon Kirby |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Route cache performance tests, CIT/Paul |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |