| To: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, ralph@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:57:59 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101956520.7801@ns.istop.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101725020.17226@ns.istop.com> <20030610.152020.59678979.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101956520.7801@ns.istop.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:58:47 -0400 (EDT) On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > Every packet records a timestamp. I'm not aware of anything in IP routing that requires a timestamp for every packet. To me it sounds like we could rip that out too. Guess you never run tcpdump nor use packet schedulers. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPSec: Policy dst bundles exhausting storage, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |